Goal: Determine the effectiveness of classroom performance system technology when consistently utilized in instruction. Compare standardized test scores where the technology was and was not utilized.
ACTION STEPS | PERSON(S) RESPONSIBLE | TIMELINE | RESOURCES | EVALUATION |
Survey teachers interested in utilizing the system
|
C. Murat |
8/17/2010-8/30/2010 |
Attendance records for introductory training held 7/28/2010 |
Survey Monkey sent via email |
Monitor usage of CPS™ system
|
C. Murat D. Fish |
9/1/2010-5/25/2011 |
Sign-out sheets/logs |
Survey Monkey sent via email; voting via Outlook |
Compare Iowa Test of Basic Skills scores (ITBS™)
|
C. Murat |
10/2010 |
ITBS scores from 2009 and 2010 | Analysis of students' individual scores from 2009 to 2010; class comparisons |
Compare Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) scores
|
C. Murat |
5/26/2011-6/15/2011 |
Test data from 2009 and 2010 | Analysis of students' individual scores from 2009 to 2010; class comparisons
|
Compile and publish results
|
C. Murat D. Fish M. Brewster |
6/30/2011 |
School web site, PTA newsletter, blog |
Conclusion on effectiveness of CPS™ technology |
I can't believe I left off analysis of data and sharing off my action research plan. My plan was already two pages because it involves an event agenda, but really...I can't believe it. Just reading your's has helped me.
ReplyDeleteI'm glad it helped! Thanks for posting!
ReplyDelete